April 2007 (No. 39). The Quarterly Newsletter of the New Zealand Securities Commission.

Enforceable undertakings

The Commission accepted enforceable undertakings from Huka Falls Resort Limited and Kensington Park Properties Limited on 5 March 2007. Both companies were developing properties with common facilities for residents.

Each development has set up an incorporated society:

  • to make and enforce bylaws of the development; and
  • to own and manage the facilities.

These companies offered membership in the incorporated societies to prospective buyers of the properties. These memberships were participatory securities under the Securities Act 1978.

The offers of securities were made without an investment statement or registered prospectus, in breach of the Act. The companies were unaware that the offers breached the law.

The companies and their directors have accepted that the offers were unlawful and have given undertakings which include that:

  • any future offers of securities to the public will be made in accordance with the provisions of the Securities Act 1978 and Securities Regulations 1983, subject to the terms and conditions of an exemption granted by the Commission;
  • procedures will be put in place so that advertisements for offers of securities to the public comply
  • with the law;
  • investors who subscribed for securities will have the opportunity to either:
    • cancel their subscription and receive a refund within 15 working days of the closing date of the offer; or
    • re-subscribe for their securities under the terms and conditions of an exemption granted by the Commission.

"Failure to comply with securities laws carries serious consequences. Issuers and their directors may be required to repay the subscription amounts with interest, and may face civil or criminal penalties," says General Counsel Liam Mason.

"Residential property developers should seek advice from a lawyer who is experienced in securities law. Developers may be able to rely on class exemptions to reduce compliance costs. Alternatively, they may seek an individual exemption from the Commission. These are considered on a case by case basis."

The signed undertakings are on www.seccom.govt.nz.

Prospectus banned

The Securities Commission has cancelled the prospectus of finance company Classic Capital Limited. The prospectus was banned because it omitted material information.

Classic Capital Limited’s sole director, Mr Keith McCoy is bankrupt, banned from management, and facing charges of forgery and dishonestly using his position as a company officer, all in Australia. The prospectus did not state these facts.

"A prospectus must contain all material information about an offer of securities," says Kathryn Rogers, Director of Primary Markets at the Securities Commission.

"Mr McCoy’s bankruptcy and management ban relate directly to his competence to handle investors’ money and to run a finance company. The fact that he is facing criminal charges, although these have not yet been heard, would also be likely to infl uence people deciding whether or not to invest."

Mr McCoy told the Commission that he is appealing the management ban and that the criminal case has not yet been decided. He agreed that the prospectus should be cancelled.

Classic Capital had been seeking to raise $15 million by issuing secured debenture stock. The Commission understands that no money had been invested.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission assisted the Commission in this matter.

New Securities Law. New law that places disclosure obligations on people who give investment advice as part of their job will come into force this year. There are also law changes relating to insider trading and substantial security holder disclosure and new law on market manipulation.

A special website www.newsecuritieslaw.govt.nz will keep people up to date with the introduction of this law.

ALSO IN THIS ISSUE:
  • Discussion paper on derivative futures contacts
  • Financial reporting Cycle 4 Review
  • Sponsorship of financial education
  • IOSCO seeks input on hedge funds
Pg 2


Pg 2

Pg 3


Pg 3

THE BULLETIN APRIL 2007